قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US Business / Turner Prize: Move to share the award triggered outrage. Why winning is out of fashion

Turner Prize: Move to share the award triggered outrage. Why winning is out of fashion



In a mass release more often seen on the Oprah Winfrey set, organizers of the UK's most prestigious modern art award, the Turner Prize, presented the trophy to all four short-listed artists – Helen Cammock, Lawrence Abu Hamdan, Oscar Murillo and Tai Shani – after they had come together and asked to share the honor.

The decision was the first for the award, previously won by acclaimed artists, including Damien Hirst and Tracey Emin. The jury's reasoning? Recognizing the artists' "shared commitment to urgent social and political causes."

So what's the problem? This sharing is a little harmless benevolence, right? A bold new way of approaching prizes and a more sophisticated way of criticizing art?

  The Turner Award won by all four nominees on appeal for & # 39; solidarity & # 39;

Not even close. According to some corners of the internet, you may well be a snowflake if you are not mad about the Turner Prize decision.

"Nonsense!" someone yelled after the Turner Prize decision was announced. "Political correctness went crazy!" chuntered others. [19659008find?"Askedthepaper"Erdette'ssymptomspring'snowflakeage'wheredidthecompetitiongowhenitwasabolished?askedforparticipationtrophy"-wassarcastictheauthorartwriterAndrewRussethtoldCNN

  Bernardine Evaristo (left) and Margaret Atwood (right) shared the Booker Prize this year.

"I don't understand why people are really worked up with it," Russeth said of the decision to jointly award the prize. [19659003] Still, with tensions between generations X and Y at the boiling point, the mass display seems to have called some feathers – and those behind it accept that it reflects is a growing trend.

But where does this give prizes? Is there any point in spending gongs anymore, or is it time to eliminate winners and losers altogether?

& # 39; They've already won & # 39;

The idea "first came from the artists themselves," said Alex Farquharson, the director of the Tate Britain gallery which organizes the Turner Prize.

"They think of themselves as a collective," he told CNN. "Each of them works in a participatory way with groups of people, and these groups of people reflect the different political and moral concerns each has in their work.

" Their concern as they provided these ways of working, the policies they take Up, the competition format could be antithetical to the goals of the work. "

  Oscars in 2019 were characterized by inclusion and firsts

In addition, Farquharson said:" Everyone who is nominated for a TP has already won in a way. "

Farquharson, who chaired the panel that handed out the award, accepts that the four-way prize would lose significance if it were repeated each year.

But he felt the idea of ​​rejecting a single winner

"We live in times when attitudes to competition are less straightforward than they were in the early years of Turner Pr izes history," says Farquharson. "There are many different prizes – unlike sports, (in art) it is impossible to arrive at an objective sense of a winner. "

The shift, Farquharson suggests, is a reaction to a political and social climate that has grown divisively." the figure, after the fall of the Berlin Wall. There was a new kind of consensus after that, "he says." Generally (nineties) was often experienced in Britain as less political times. "

But he cites 9/11, the economic crash and Brexit as three milestones, after which" a sense of the world in conflict became very clear again. "

" Where oppression and divisiveness is felt in society and politically, artists become more or react in a very political way. "

Want to see more ties?

Ceremonies that award prizes to the left, right and center, the question remains – what happened to winning?

" Back in my day, artists wanted kill for the Turner Prize. Literally kill! They would lie, cheat and steal, "Russeth wrote in his tongue-in-cheek Twitter post – which quickly won praise from many who are angry with the decision." Bribery judging? Sure. Sabotage a competitor's intricate installation? No big deal, "he added.

  Co-Glenn Close and Lady Gaga Accept Critics & # 39; Best Actress Choice Award.

In fact, Russeth told CNN: "This notion of having artists compete in public and once away the winner feels a bit degrading and uncomfortable. "

He called the Turner Prize decision a" nice gesture. "But he was not surprised that the decision took so long to arrive.

" People like the drama … everyone likes to announce the winner, "he said, noting that cultural awards have become an industry in him. itself.

Still, the industry is showing signs of slack. Last year's Oscars ceremony was the lowest grade ever, and the year's second lowest. Grammys and Emmys have also hit record lows in recent years – and with interest faded and no stunt which will add some relevance cannot be ruled out.
  Emmys could use a regular home after record lows </p>
<p>  Emmys could use a regular home after record lows ” class=”media__image” src=”http://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190922174141-emmys-show-large-169.jpg”/> </noscript> </div>
</p></div>
</p></div>
<p>  It was the feeling from a few corners after the Critics' Choice Awards gave the same award to Close and Gaga. </p>
<p>  It wasn't shared by the artists themselves – or at least, that's what they said when they appeared for their joint winners & # 39 ; press conference. "Je g is so excited that it's a draw, I can't say it, "Close told reporters. "The world shape pits us against each other in this profession, and I know that from all the women in this category, and I think I can speak for all the women in this room, we celebrate each other." </p>
<p>  But if the artists involved are happy to get a winner, what is the point of having awards at all? </p>
<p>  "The world is set in its own way," says Russeth, regarding the ongoing existence of ceremonies. "At least a gesture of experimenting with something else (getting) people weighing in … I hope that's not the end." </p>
<p>  So with the movie awards seasons approaching the new year, it might be time to prepare for more shared prizes, more "excellent" winners – and more generational crowds. </p><div><script async src=

Source link