US Judgment on Roundup Cancer Sack Bayer Stock Price | News | DW

On Tuesday, an American jury concluded that Roundup weed killer was a "significant factor" for causing cancer in a 70-year-old California man.

The ruling is a blow to Bayer, whose subsidiary Monsanto does the herbicide. The experiment can pave the way for several cases that connect glyphosate in Roundup to the development of cancer.

Read more: Germany sets new restrictions on glyphosate

Details of the case:

  • California resident Edwin Hardeman was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma after using Roundup for 25 years.
  • The jury in San Francisco came to the unanimous verdict that the porridge murder had contributed greatly.
  • Now, the attempt will enter a second phase to determine if Monsanto is responsible for damage.
  • The plaintiff's lawyers can now present evidence showing Monsanto's efforts to swing scientists and influence regulators.

Read more: Does Monsanto know that his grasshopper can be fatal to humans?

Bayer rejects responsibility

Hardeman's lawyers said: "Now we can focus on the evidence that Monsanto has not taken a responsible, objective approach to the security of Roundup."

Bayer, who bought Monsant o last year said, "We are confident that the evidence in phase two shows that Monsanto's behavior has been appropriate, and the company should not be responsible for Mr. Hardeman's cancer."

Bayer saw its stock price slump by more than 1[ads1]0 percent by trade Frankfurt opened on Wednesday.

Read more: Could agricultural robots replace glyphosate?

The stock price falls: In the wake of the government, Bayer's stock price fell more than 12 percent before it rallied a bit. Traders dried NOK 8 billion in value from the company, the largest intraday loss of 16 years.

Does glyphosate cause cancer?

While critics quickly describe glyphosate – the most important chemical substance in Roundup – As a carcinogen, research is far from final on the question.

According to the EU health authorities, experts concluded with only one exception that glyphosate is not likely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans, and the evidence does not support classification with respect to its carcinogenic potential. "

Studies obtained by the United Nations World Health Organization have yielded conflicting results, but one of these studies, conducted by WHO's International Agency for Cancer Research, states that it is" probably carcinogenic to humans. "

Bayer the question that:" The IARC perception is incompatible with 40 years of scientific research on glyphosate. Among the four WHO agencies that have IARC are the only WHO to find a link between glyphosate and carcinogenicity, it says in a statement.

Read more: Pesticides: Let the EU make the industry write their own rules

Pandora's box?

The case is seen as a bellwether trial for more than 11,000 Roundup lawsuits that are expected to be the trial in the United States. It is expected to settle settlement options for more than 700 cases consolidated in San Francisco's federal court.

Last year, a judge in San Francisco maintained a jury's verdict that found Monsanto responsible for a ground carrier's cancer. The case is appealed after the judge has shot injuries from $ 289 million to $ 255 million.

Every night, DW's editors send a selection of today's difficult news and quality features to journalism. You can register to receive it directly here. Ls, aw / msh (AP, Reuters)

Source link

Back to top button