This means that each person can have about one burger and a half each week.
The Final Report "Creating a Sustainable Food Future" Published Wednesday takes a closer look at the gaps in food production and global demand and makes more concrete recommendations on how to prevent a catastrophe.
Eating less beef is such a suggestion in the 568-page report.
Rising population, greater food requirements
About 9.8 billion people will live on the planet by 2050, rising from 7 billion people in 201[ads1]0. The demand for food is expected to exceed population growth and increases by more than 50% as people's income in developing countries is expected to increase, according to the report.
Demand for meat and dairy is expected to rise even faster, by nearly 70%. The global demand for beef meat, meaning beef, sheep and goat, is expected to be even higher, at 88%.
But to keep up with the food requirements, the report assumes that farmers will produce 56% more crop calories than in 2010 – and that means land will be nearly twice as large as India.
Closing these holes is "more difficult than often recognized", according to the report.
Cows Grow and Reproduce Slower Than pigs and poultry, which means they need to eat much more and need more land and water.
In the US, only beef accounts for about 3% of the calories in the average American diet, but it uses 43% of US land used for agriculture, the report said.
The current report Suggesting people living in countries like the United States who eat a lot of steak, compared to the rest of the world, don't have to give up hamburgers, but they have to cut down how many they eat.
The report suggests that this is feasible and necessary, although "the challenges are formidable." It points to eating trends in the United States as an example. In the late 1970s, Americans ate much more beef than they do today.
In 1976, the Americans ate more than 94 pounds of beef a year. In 2018, it was 57.2 pounds.
Changing to plant-based diets
Switching to plant-based foods will help the environment most, but the benefits of most climate and land users will still occur even if people switch from eating beef to chicken and pigs, find report.
"Beef is both sustainable and nutritious. Environmentally, cattle play a unique role in our math system because they upgrade inedible plants to high-grade protein. Protein that shows decades of research, promotes health and helps to prevent nutrient deficiencies," Hillary said. Spouse, Director of Media Relations for the Association in a Sent Message.
"Most people already eat steak within global dietary guidelines, so we argue that the greatest potential for a healthy sustainable diet comes from reducing food waste. History and well-established research have consistently shown that science-based advances and practical, balanced dietary patterns contribute to health and health. sustainability, and does not eliminate single food, like beef. "
While the market can reduce the demand for beef, governments can also take steps to make other menu items more desirable, the report says. For example, governments may be phasing out declines for meat and milk production or starting to tax beef, making it more expensive.