The Supreme Court will not undergo a decision that was OK for Obama-Your Net Neutrality Rules: NPR

The Supreme Court has rejected telecom companies' attempt to wipe down a court decision that maintained the Obama Administration's net neutrality rules. AT & T and other telecom operators ask the court to invalidate the decision; Federal Communications Commission abolished net neutrality last year.

In addition to the telecommunications companies, the FCC itself was in favor of denying the decision that maintained its 2015 2015 rules, according to Jessica Rosenworcel, a Democrat on the Commission.

"It was not enough for this FCC to roll back #NetNeutrality," Rosenworcel said in a tweet. "It actually called on the Supreme Court to delete the story and eradicate a previous court decision with open internet policy. But today the Supreme Court refused to do so."

She added: "Let's call this interesting."

The legal features reflected a Desiring conservative and industrial players to cement FCC's abolition of network neutrality rules designed to limit Internet service providers ability to manipulate cargo speeds for particular websites or apps.

The refusal came after two conservative righteous – Chief Justice John Roberts and Justis Brett Kavanaugh – "did not participate in the consideration or decision of these requests," proclaimed the court on Monday.

With the fairnesses removed from the process, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch were countless. The court's notice states that the three righteousnesses wanted to "grant the requests, leave the judgment of the United States Court of Appeal for the District of Columbia Circuit, and hand over to the court with instructions to reject the case as fashion."

As for why Roberts and Kavanaugh used themselves, Amy Howe from SCOTUSBlog reports:

"The Court's newest justice, Brett Kavanaugh, was expected to receive a petition because he had participated in the case while on DC circuit, and he did, but boss John Roberts also spent – probably (although there's no way to know for sure) because he owns shares in one of the companies that challenge the rules. "

As one of the plaintiffs In the case, TechFreedom, notes, Kavanaugh wrote "a major deviation from the DC circuit's decision last year, not to rehear a panel decision that stuck in the 2015 order."

Several of the plaintiffs in the case said the rejection was not silly, given that the FCC had already abolished network neutrality.

"Today's decision is not an indication of the Court's view of the value, but only reflects the fact that there was nothing left for the Court to rule over," the Internet and Television Association said.

However, the rejection of the court rejects the appeal court's decision as a possible precedent and makes it even more likely that the problem will come back if the FCC changes its makeup – something that would happen if the democrats are able to win back the White House by 2020. [19659002] FCC's elimination of net neutrality is also subject to separate legal blows, after challenging technical companies and law groups, as well as more than 20 US states.