Situs Slot Gacor Slot Gacor Gampang Menang Situs Slot Gacor

Tesla Model Y, Model 3, and Green New Deal together point the way to a sustainable future

 Tesla Model Y

Published on March 17, 2019 |

by Carolyn Fortuna

17. March 2019 by Carolyn Fortuna

Is Tesla Model Y and Model 3 Supplements for the Green New Deal?

This week, Tesla announced the launch of another SUV model to add its all-electric car catalog: Model Y. The upcoming model Y has a reputed sticker price of just under $ 40,000, about 1[ads1]0% more than the mass claim Tesla Model 3. As another new child On the block, Green New Deal (GND), model Y faces the challenge of achieving more goals.

At its most basic, Model Y must satisfy consumer demand for various features while bearing a price tag that is comparable to existing ICE vehicles, and the GND device must set naysayers to its clean energy vision in the market. Does Tesla Model Y (and Model 3) and GND have enough environmental and "economic mobilization" to be breakthrough sustainability leaders?

  Tesla Model Y "width =" 1730 "height =" 696 "srcset =" https: // 1730w, https: // cleantechnica .com / files / 2019/03 / Tesla-Model-Y-1-270x109.png 270w, 768w, https : // .png 570w "sizes =" (maximum width: 1730px) 100vw, 1730px

Tesla Model Y

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) brought crucial US focus on climate change with GND and its emphasis on a national low-carbon economy. GND aims to repair the climate, make the clean energy market more competitive, and create a green workforce. An article in Washington Post claims, however, that GND "encapsulates the liberal delusion of climate change: that technology and spending can save us the hard work of reform."

Who takes on the matter gives more meaning? And model Y helps fill that gap in the "hard work on reform?"

 Tesla Model Y "class =" aligncenter size-full wp-image-174194 "srcset =" https: // 1542w , 270w, https: // 768x550.png 768w, 570w "sizes =" (maximum width: 1542px) 100vw, 1542px

Electrifies everything, special transport

Henry Olson in Washington Post says Green New Deal (GND) is "both a wonderful pipe dream and stalking horse for socialism."

A frequent mantra for achieving a zero-carbon future is electrifying everything, and GND, with the goal of achieving "100% zero-emission vehicles by 2030" and "100% fossil-free transport by 2050," works consistently with full electrification (though the resolution does not explicitly state this). Many people declare that aggressive electrification of the ways we drive flows up our personal energy entities, and regulating the temperatures in our homes can make the difference we need to carbonate our world.

The ICE technologies that drive most of our transportation today are inherently ineffective. Less than a quarter of the energy consumption is used to drive the cars – the balance is rejected as waste heat. If we were to choose electricity to drive our cars of all sizes and capacities, more than 90% of the energy devoted to our personal transport would be used appropriately. Let's translate it differently. We could provide the driving potential of a gallon of gasoline by replacing as little as 8 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity.

A Mother Jones article claims that "electric vehicles are not ready for widespread adoption." What does Tesla do to prove that the claim is right or wrong? What does the market outside Tesla mean?

What progress does the new Tesla Model Y (and current available model 3) make to achieve full electric transport and a zero-carbon future?

Enhanced Battery Power for EV Audiences

For cross-sector electrification is considered beneficial, according to a 2019 White Paper entitled Beneficial Electrification of Transportation and an addition from CleanTechnica, it must meet one or more of the following conditions without affecting the others:

  • save consumers' money in the long run;
  • enable better web management;
  • improve car quality and characteristics;
  • reduce negative environmental impacts.

Favorable electrification attempts to exploit technology trends for the benefit of consumers, network operations and the environment, but it has historically been limited by battery costs. It changes.

The biggest difference in price in advance between an EV and an ICE car is the cost of the battery. This cost difference has shrunk over the market and can often be offset by lower operating costs. In the case of the Tesla Model 3 or Model Y, the vehicles are actually better than similarly priced ICE options in many objective ways. In other words, the cost difference has gone away and even been reversed.

There is at least one mass market electric vehicle on the market that is better than other cars at the price point. There is another, model Y, on the road in a couple of years. Other car manufacturers are not yet at this level, but technology trends and trends in the automotive industry indicate that they will be within a few years or so. They will also create electric vehicles that do not compete with ICE cars in their classes, except in niche positions.

Charging and achieving greater economic equality

The green new agreement requires rights to systemic injustice for societies, disproportionately affected by environmental issues and economic inequality. Tesla Model Y, a luxury car listing that uses a private, proprietary charging infrastructure, raises the issue of electrification equity. But perhaps the model Y targets are not as distant as possibly first perceived.

For example, Tesla and the city of Pasadena have agreed on a 5-year plan that will see them collaborate on the construction of the largest EV fast-charging device in the Western United States. Tesla will install 24 of its Superchargers on a central parking garage roof as well as basic electrical wiring needed to install another 20 Level 3 quick chargers.

Such collaboration is at the heart of both Tesla Model Y and GND Transforming Market to appeal to potential consumers across social teams.

Furthermore, local pollution damages more generally lower income groups. Cleaning up the air in a way that is possible for anyone living in a city will benefit people who cannot afford a Tesla.

In addition, most new technologies are expensive and must be purchased by the rich before costs can be cut and they can be sold to lower income populations. This was the core idea behind Tesla's 2006 Secret Master Plan – producing an expensive and expensive sports car (the first Tesla Roadster), using money from it to produce cheaper yet high-end luxury cars (model S and model X), and use the money from them to produce even cheaper, mass market electric vehicles (model 3 and model Y). Tesla delivers on it and brings electric cars to many more households, and the next logical step is an even more affordable Tesla (Model 2?) For another part of the car market – the biggest level.


Final Thoughts

A transport transformation is underway, as evidenced by the buzz around the release of the Tesla Model Y. As the months continue, we learn more about the specifications of this all-electric vehicle and the economic and practical way forward.

The ambitious Green New Deal targets – a 40% to 60% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 – cannot be met by transport electrification alone. Bloomberg reports that even with a mass market passenger transport, half of the world's oil consumption would remain untouched. "GND's goals will require states to develop integrated resource planning to help envision both the potential of transport electrification and its impact on the power system. The investments must be targeted to the needs of known and potential charging, and the needs of each community will vary.

But Tesla Model Y is another piece of the vast and far-reaching puzzle called GND, each working to move us towards a completely sustainable future, each talking to ways in which transport must convert from a dirty, unlike system to more sustainability and economic justice

Tags: green new appointment, Tesla, Tesla Model 3, Tesla Model Y

About the author

Carolyn Fortuna Carolyn Fortuna, Ph.D. is an author, researcher, and teacher with a lifelong commitment to eco-rights. She has won awards from the Anti-Defamation League, The International Literacy Association and The Leavy Foundation. She supports digital media scholarship grants and learns to spread the word about sustainability issues. Please follow me on Twitter and Facebook and Google+

Source link

Back to top button