Pentagon's $ 10 billion agreement to provide cloud services for the Department of Defense officially went to Microsoft on Friday. The news came as an upset for Amazon, whose competing bid appeared to be the front runner for most of the contract overlays. Throughout the years-long process, President Donald Trump has repeatedly rebuked Amazon's outlook, in part as an extension of his outspoken vendetta to the company and its CEO, Jeff Bezos.
According to a Washington Following Report Microsoft is now set to take over the Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure (JEDI) project, a potentially decade-long federal cloud computing initiative that has aroused interest from some of the biggest names in the tech. In addition to Microsoft and Amazon, Oracle and Google also went after the massive contract. The latter dropped out of the run last year after widespread protests made it very clear that Google employees were not happy about the prospect of working for the US military.
Although both Microsoft and Amazon were finalists for the contract the choice seemed quite obvious. Amazon Web Services both have a larger market share in cloud computing ̵
While the project remained unfinished in July, a flow chart created by Oracle detailed an elaborate " conspiracy " at stake to secure the Amazon contract somehow found its way to Trump's desk, which got the president to order an investigation into possible foul play. Internal inquiries found no evidence of the undermining Oracle described, CNN reported at that time.
But that didn't stop Trump from retweeting the coverage from Fox News, which nicknamed the contract "Bezos bailout" along with other seemingly partial views. He often criticizes the Bezos-owned Washington Post as "fake news" for its less than flattering coverage of the White House as well as Bezos himself and Amazon by extension. Technically, federal procurement laws should prevent politicians from thumbing the scale of these cases. At least they did it back when Washington wasn't constantly on fire . Who knows, these days.
All these reprimands could be ammunition for possible litigation if Amazon chose to push back against Pentagon's decision. A lawyer at the law firm of McCarter & English, Franklin Turner, told The Post:
“It is crystal clear here that the US president did not want this contract awarded to one of the competitors. As a result, it is quite likely that we will see a number of challenges with the procurement not being carried out on equal terms. "
In an announcement about the award he described the Department of Defense as a book decision," the Post reported. "The procurement process was carried out in accordance with current laws and regulations." Furthermore, II parties were "treated fairly and evaluated consistently with the request's stated assessment criteria."
Yeah, s something tells me that Amazon is not going to see it that way.
[ The Washington Post ]