In a thesis for Washington Post and Independent.ie Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg says he believes there must be "a more active role for governments and regulators" for to counteract wider societal threats while balancing freedom of speech. He outlines four broad areas where he feels there is a need for new regulation: data portability, choice integrity, harmful content and privacy.
Zuckerberg uses up-ed to file his case for each of the four areas and states that "Internet companies should be responsible for enforcing malicious content standards," and say it must be "a more standardized approach "when it comes to taking down harmful content across a range of services. He suggests that regulators can set standards to define what constitutes malicious content and the guidelines for removing it from online platforms.
For elections, he outlined the steps Facebook has taken to improve the selection, such as new rules for publication for political ads and searchable databases (although There have been some stumbling blocks along the way for such ads, but note that there is a lot of gray area in determining what is an ad and what is not (again, in trouble). He points out that existing laws that address political spending are often centered on the candidates themselves, rather than organizations advocating specific issues, and note that laws must be updated to address the "reality of the threads and set industry-wide standards."
When it comes to privacy regulation, Zuckerberg comes out with a similar set of rules as the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), saying that "it would be good for the Internet if more countries adopted regulation like the GDPR as a common framework." He also says that such regulations should "Protect your right to choose how your information is used," and should include ways to punish companies when making mistakes. "
Finally, he notes that such rules should" guarantee the principle of data portability "and let people move the information from service to service and that there should be a common standard that businesses can use.
Zuckerberg's up-and-coming bruise for several years for the company, and a rare call from the Regulatory Reduction Silicon Valley, moments like the Cambridge Analytica scandal in 2017 raised strong questions about the role of social media and the company plays in society and what influence it has over its users Recently, the terrorist attack in Christchurch, New Zealand renewed debate on what role the internet plays in the radicalization of bad actors, terror and hate groups.
This recent set-up is a development from Zuckerberg's comments almost a year ago, when he told various outlets that he was not "sure we should not be regulated" and felt that it was a role for regulators given It was "correct" regulation and that he felt "policies are much better than dictating certain processes." His op-ed requires specific, standardized rules for internet businesses to follow and it sees seemingly that Facebook's experiences at that time have led some soul to seek out their role in society and connect people around the world as well as their own future, which Zuckerberg recently signaled could shift to focus on a more privacy-oriented platform that was more about private messages and groups than public news feed.
That self-search has come together with demands for more regulation for companies such as Facebook, as well as direct calls for the company to be broken up, not only from outlets like ourselves, but from the presidential candidates too , claiming to exert too much influence on society. The Congress has held a number of hearings on the matter, and although there have been plans and proposals for such regulations, much has not yet come. Despite the pressure on Facebook still being in place, and this latest act seems to indicate that Facebook recognizes that the world it will be in the first 15 years of its life will be very different from the next 15.