قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Business / Jury returns $ 2 billion judgment against Monsanto for couples with cancer

Jury returns $ 2 billion judgment against Monsanto for couples with cancer



The judgment in Oakland includes more than $ 55 million in compensatory damages to the couple and $ 2 billion in punitive damages, a statement said.

The verdict "is so clear of a statement that you can get that they need to change what they do," said one of the plaintiffs' lawyers, Brent Wisner, to journalists on Monday.

There are several recent losses that the company has encountered in the Roundup court. Thousands of similar cases are expected at federal or state level.

Bayer, Monsanto's parent company, insists that glyphosate – the key service in Roundup – is safe.

"Bayer is disappointed with the jury's decision and will appeal the verdict in this case" It was said in a statement after Monday's verdict.

The septuagenic plaintiffs, Alva and Alberta Pilliod of Livermore, used the herbicide on the property for more than three decades and were diagnosed with the same type of cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, four years apart, according to their lawyers.

Bayer said the jury was presented with "cherry-picked findings" that were not in accordance with a statement last month by the US Environmental Protection Agency, which announced that glyphosate was not a carcinogen and did not pose public health risks when used as directed.
  EPA says glyphosate, the main constituent of Roundup, does not produce cancer. Others are not so safe

"The contrast between today's judgment and EPA's conclusion that there is no risk to public health from current registered use of glyphosate" could not be stronger, " said Bayer.

Not all groups, however, have played the EPA's announcement. Things like the pillars surged after a report by the World Health Organization in 2015 suggested that glyphosate can cause cancer.

The report, from WHO's International Agency for Cancer Research, says that glyphosate is "probably carcinogenic to humans." Bayer's statement on Monday said the plaintiffs "strongly believed" at the agency's 2015 assessment, but called it "an outlier among international healthcare regulators and scientific bodies."
Most lymphoma cases have no known cause , According to the American Cancer Society, 19659004] There have also been concerns about Monsanto's having undue influence over regulators, with internal business documents is playing a key role in Monday's verdict, according to the plaintiff's lawyers.

In the statement, Michael Miller, another of the pillion's lawyers, said that their case is different from two previous Monsanto attempts "where the judges severely restricted the amount of plaintiffs' evidence." He said the jury was showing a "mountain of evidence that showed Monsanto's manipulation of science, media and regulatory agencies to send his own agenda."

On Monday, Wisner said this evidence contained e-mails and text messages between Monsanto and EPA officials.

A Monsanto spokesman previously denied that the company had ever paid, donated or otherwise done to curry favor with anyone from the EPA.

"This will continue to Monsanto and now Bayer takes responsibility for his product," Wisner said.

"This is not the end of this trial," he said. "This is the beginning."

CNN's Holly Yan, Sarah Moon and Cheri Mossburg contributed to this report.


Source link