قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Business / Judge to reassess $ 80 million in Monsanto cancer case

Judge to reassess $ 80 million in Monsanto cancer case



A US judge will reassess a jury's $ 80 million injury rate to a California cancer victim using Monsanto's Roundup weed killer.U.S. District judge Vince Chhabria said in a hearing on Tuesday that he would reduce, but not completely eliminate, the penalties for what he called the company's "reprehensible" behavior, the San Francisco Chronicle reported. The judge said the evidence in the trial showed that "Monsanto didn't really care about its products causing cancer." After questions arose in the company about product safety, and a World Health Organization agency classified glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen in 201

5. Monsanto lawyer Brian Stekloff responded that the company's actions were "in accordance with regulatory and scientific consensus." In March, a jury discovered that glyphosate was a likely cause of the 70-year-old Edwin Hardeman's diagnosis of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Hardeman was diagnosed with cancer in 2015 after spraying the product on his Sonoma County property for over 26 years. Lawyers awarded him $ 200,000 for financial loss, $ 3 million for past pain and suffering, another $ 2 million for emotional distress in his upcoming year, and $ 75 million for immediate injury. Hardman's cancer is now in remission. Khhabria showed no sign of giving Monsanto's request to counter the sentence, but he planned to reduce the $ 75 million price to comply with the Supreme Court's constitutional standards, specifying that distributions more than four times the amount of compensation awarded require special justification and cannot exceed Nine times the compensation except in extraordinary cases. Hardeman's lawyer, Aimee Wagstaff, claimed that Monsanto's conduct showed that the case was extraordinary and the high injury rate was needed to send a message to the company, valued at $ 7.8 billion. Wagstaff also pushed back to the judge's question about the $ 2 million prize for Hardeman's remaining years, saying: "Fears come back with every test." Thousands of similar lawsuits against Monsanto are awaited in state and federal courts. Monsanto is appealing judges in the few cases that have been determined.

An American judge will reassess a jury's $ 80 million injury price to a California cancer victim using Monsanto's Roundup weedmill.

U.S. District judge Vince Chhabria said in a hearing on Tuesday that he would reduce, but not completely eliminate, the penalties for what he called the company's "reprehensible" behavior, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.

The judge said that evidence in the trial showed "Monsanto did not really care about the product's products causing cancer." After questioning the company's product safety, and a World Health Organization agency classified glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen in 2015

Monsanto lawyer Brian Stekloff replied that the company's actions were "consistent with the legislative and scientific consensus."

In March, a jury discovered that glyphosate was a likely cause of the 70-year-old Edwin Hardeman's diagnosis of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma . Hardeman was diagnosed with cancer in 2015 after spraying the product on his property in Sonoma County for over 26 years.

Lawyers gave him $ 200,000 for financial loss, $ 3 million for past pain and suffering, another $ 2 million for emotional distress in his future years, and $ 75 million in immediate injury. Hardman's cancer is now in imitation.

Chhabria showed no sign of giving Monsanto's request to counter the sentence, but he planned to reduce the $ 75 million price to comply with the Supreme Court's constitutional standards, specifying that rewards over four times the amount of compensation awarded require special justification and may Do not exceed nine times the compensation except in extraordinary cases.

Hardeman's lawyer, Aimee Wagstaff, claimed that Monsanto's conduct showed that the case was extraordinary, and the high injury rate was needed to send a message to the company, valued at $ 7.8 billion.

Wagstaff also pushed back to the judge's question about the $ 2 million prize for Hardeman's remaining years, saying: "Fear comes back with every test."

Thousands of similar lawsuits against Monsanto are awaited in state and federal courts. Monsanto is appealing verdict in the few cases that have been determined.

AlertMe


Source link