قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Business / Hudson Yards & # 39; vessel has the right to use any pictures and videos you take of them forever: Gothamist

Hudson Yards & # 39; vessel has the right to use any pictures and videos you take of them forever: Gothamist



  031819vesselphoto1.jpg
(Scott Lynch / Gothamist)

The massive "Vessel" is the honeycomb-like crown jewel from Hudson Yards, which officially opened on Friday. It's been compared to a giant Shawarma, a comic oversized pine forest, a rejected MC Escher feverish dream, and a "200 million dollar staircase that doesn't actually take you anywhere." Whether you think it is an eye-catcher or the next big public art installation, there is no doubt that it was purposefully designed to lure millions of visitors each year and inspire an infinite number of selfies and Instagram photos. But here's something to keep in mind if you decide to get that picture: just by visiting the vessel, you give the vessel the rights to use the entire vessel's content.

In Hudson Yard's terms and conditions, which you probably haven't read, ely closes, there are two remarkable and exceptional clauses that state that by creating, posting, or uploading content depicting or relating to vessels, they are right and license to use your content, but they always look forever. Likewise, if you only appear in an image with the vessel, they also have the right to use your name, equality, voice and the rest of everything for any commercial purpose they fit into eternity.

My name and likeness. If I appear in, create, upload, post or post photographs, audio recordings or video recordings that show or relate to the vessel, I give the company the unlimited, worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual right and license (with the right to transfer or sub-license) to use my name, equality, vote and all other aspects of my persona for the purpose of operating, developing, offering, marketing, advertising and improving the vessel or other products or services provided by the Company or its sublicensees (in both cases, now known or later developed). I understand that I am not entitled to compensation from the Company, its subsidiaries or its affiliates if my name, similarity or voice is used in the vessel's marketing and promotions, either on the company's website, social media or otherwise.

MY CONTENT. If I create, upload, post or post photos, audio recordings or video recordings that show or relate to the vessel, I will give the company and its affiliates the irrevocable, unlimited, worldwide, perpetual, royalty-free, sublicensable, and transferable rights and license to use, display, reproduce, perform, modify, transmit, publish, and distribute such photographs, audio recordings or video recordings for anything in any medium (in either case, now known or developed later). I also allow the Company to store such images in a database and transfer such images to third parties in connection with the security and marketing procedures performed by the vessel. Such use and storage should always be in accordance with the privacy rules. I will not exploit any photographs, audio recordings or video recordings of the vessel for any commercial purpose without the company's written consent.

"Very much the only thing they didn't ask for was the copyright of the material. But you It's pretty big to give them an extremely wide license, and that's unfortunate, but we see that such overbearing rights come up all the time," Mickey said. H. Osterreicher, Secretary General of the National Press Photographers Association (NPPA) .Gothamist. He explained that the vessel does not own your content, but they allow a broad license to do what they want with it commercially without your own. consent, and you are not allowed to use it commercially.

"There is one thing when you go to the theater, they say it is not allowed photography. But to allow you to take pictures, but say that you cannot use them commercially, which is understandable, but to say that you give them a license to use commercially, is quite overreach, "said the Osterreicher

 031<div class="e3lan e3lan-in-post1"><script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Text_Display_Responsive -->
<ins class="adsbygoogle"
     style="display:block"
     data-ad-client="ca-pub-6192903739091894"
     data-ad-slot="3136787391"
     data-ad-format="auto"
     data-full-width-responsive="true"></ins>
<script>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
</script></div>819vesselphoto2.jpg
(Scott Lynch / Gothamist)

Osterreicher explained that this type of photo rights grip is becoming increasingly common in social media, and it has created an inverse of it Typical legal burden: "Normally, if you took a picture and you didn't post it anywhere, and they wanted to get those pictures from you, the burden would be on them to find those pictures and get them. But because so many share things on social media, this simply gives them the right to say that if they see a picture, they can take it and use it in a way they see fit, and then it would be your burden to go after them and say, "Hey wait a moment, you used my performance without credit, compensation or permission." And they come back and say, "Oh, but you gave us permission. Not just permission to use your show, but you gave us permission to use your name and your photo."

And that is Not only private citizens affected by this: outlets such as the Gothamist or the New York Times can also, in theory, see their photos and videos and the drone footage being reused in future Vessel advertising campaigns.

Osterreicher connected this type of power movement with more general problems that damage the professional photography industry as a whole: "It's a very difficult time, photography has just become so ubiquitous," he said. Camera, and everyone takes pictures, hundreds of millions of photos are uploaded every day, and it's really devalued photography to the point that we see things like this, where people think they can get away with a right like this. is a little pushback, until there is some negative publicity, until it is more harmful to them than not, organizations will continue to do so. "

Cornell Tech and Cornell Law School Professor James Grimmelmann offered some thoughts on what he described as one "poorly prepared clause" on Twitter:

We have come out to the vessel's representatives to ask how the policy was determined and how it can be implemented in the future. Meanwhile, I hope this rat understands that he could well be the face of the next vessel campaign.


Source link