How Elizabeth Warren wins over tech's billionaires

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg thinks an Elizabeth Warren presidency would "suck." And you can assume that his peers agree with him.

But a pretty surprising thing has happened in Silicon Valley over the past six months: Tech has warmed up to Elizabeth Warren.

The candidate who wants to break up Zuckerberg's company and other tech giants is emerging as a front-runner in Silicon Valley elite circles – even as she pays the sheer effort of the elite to get to know her better. [19659004] Hunter Walk, a former Google product director who is now a venture capitalist, calls it "evolution."

"Finding her right on everything else and then disqualifying when it comes to my industry? Maybe it's a little too expensive," Walk said. "I'm willing to say, '# 39; Yes, change all the other things! Eliminate all these assumptions! & # 39; But then, my God, when she said something about technology, is it disqualifying? Come on." [1[ads1]9659005] Walk is not alone: ​​Recodes the canvas of a group of major Democratic donors and fundraising efforts in Silicon Valley showing that Warren is making significant inroads with some of the most technically wealthy Democrats, that progress would have been unthinkable just six months ago after she asked for The iconic companies of the industry were to be subdivided.

Warren has not moderated her vitriolic rhetoric against Silicon Valley at times, but tech elites are not, as often characterized, single-choice voters driven by technology politics, and the two dozen technology leaders, investors and veteran collectors who spoke to Recode outlined three key reasons why their industry is making this unexpected shift toward Warren: They say they respect her political rigor, and look at her as inferior e radical than ever imagined (and especially compared to Bernie Sanders). And, most importantly, she has a sensible way to win the nomination, and there is nothing Silicon Valley loves more than a winner.

What is even more unusual is that Warren is making moves with these elites by doing almost none of the traditional lure and coding that is a mainstay of today's big money era. While some of her 2020 competitors return to Silicon Valley several times in a month, Warren, with at least one measure, is doing the best in the tech industry, while also doing the least – sometimes with pleasure.

If Silicon Valley embraces her, Warren does not repeat retribution.

Technical-wide support for Warren can be difficult to quantify because, unlike any candidate other than Bernie Sanders, she does not raise the high-dollar fundraising circuit that offers a semi-public scorecard for who has won over the party's leading donors . But at executive dinners, in hotel rooms and on private donor lists across the Bay area, Warren appears to be an outsider that Silicon Valley insiders can live with.

Fans range from Barry McCarthy, the underrated chief executive of Spotify (she "raises the level of political discourse," he says) to the outspoken former Facebook executive Chamath Palihapitiya ("I don't agree with many of her suggestions, but I gave to Elizabeth Warren because she is the only major candidate with a piece written down, " he tweeted ).

Also cut $ 2,800 checks to Warren in recent months is former Y Combinator boss Sam Altman; the founder of Sonos, John MacFarlane; and Chris Sacca a billionaire investor who operates a network of Silicon Valley liberal donors. Just as Google's rank-and-file employees are surprisingly pro-Warren, counter-intuitive cracks are also beginning to appear at the elite level.

Warren & # 39; s team repeated to Recode that she has not changed the policy to be closer to technology givers, regardless of their newly supported support for her.

"She does not deal with fundraisers or high dollar call time. Because of this policy, Elizabeth is able to spend her time making the case for her plan to break up Big Tech and put power back in the hands of the American people – whether it's a poster in the heart of Silicon Valley or to take on Amazon in Long Island City, "said her campaign.

Silicon Valley's strange new respect for Elizabeth Warren

Rob Stavis, a venture capitalist who gave more than $ 1 million for Democratic purposes ahead of the Midstopes last year, is a self-described moderate who prefers the same in the Democratic nominee. But even then, he acknowledges a certain pervasive respect for the Massachusetts senator, though he remains neutral.

"She's growing on me," Stavis said, "From & # 39; it will seem crazy, & # 39; to & # 39; I take her over Trump."

To To be sure, Warren has not satisfied his critics, especially those at the top of the very companies she wants to break up. Zuckerberg's leaked comments should make it clear: He has the right to believe that Elizabeth Warren represents an "existential threat" for his company. She hardly wants to see donations from Tim Cook or Larry Page.

And Warren's proposed wealth tax, which would impose a tax on people with more than $ 50 million in assets, retains its yuck factor among Silicon Valley

But one thing that is widely misunderstood by technology givers is that technology policy is not their all-consuming single issue.

For example, Steve Dow, a venture capitalist, sees Warren's initial proposal to break up tech companies as an opening position that he does not take them

"Although I do not always agree with the full scope of some of her ideas, I think they are rightly correct – and always well thought out," said Dow, who cut her a check earlier this year. It's "unlike Bernie, which I don't support," he said.

Three things have strengthened Warren's position in Silicon Valley since she rattled the tech cage last winter, Democratic fundraisers say.

First, each of her new political plans has won hard-earned Silicon Valley kudos, which finds her intellectually simpatico even if they disagree with her.

"The clarity of her plans and her message is the way people in tech are used to talking about tackling problems," said Nabeel Hyatt, an early investor in companies such as Discord and Postmates. "Even if you disagree with some things, it's just the craving for expertise, for someone who wants to do a job well."

Even venture capitalist Bilal Zuberi – who offered one of the most vocal rebukes to Wear's plan to break up tech, tells reporters that Warren "jumped on the bandwagon to blame the technology for all social ills" – has now evolved.

Although he calls her technological proposal an "emotional outbreak," Zuberi says her other plans for green production jobs and student loan debt are well thought out. "Land before technique," he said.

Second, some high-dollar donors – people who donate thousands of dollars a year – also say that when they listened to Warren at City Hall and on podcasts, they discovered more differences between her and promised socialists like Bernie Sanders than they at first assumed. Warren has for months tried to subtly draw this distinction.

Steve Silberstein, a former software manager who has donated millions of dollars for democratic purposes as one of the party's biggest donors, does not see Warren as a left-wing ideology.

"My guess is that Silicon Valley entrepreneurs believe in capitalism, markets and competition just like [Warren]. My guess is that they don't like monopoly or socialism, and that they are in line with [Warren]"said Silberstein, who has hosted Warren for several high-dollar events at his home in Marin County over the years. "It is becoming increasingly clear that she is the one most people like best."

Similarly, MacFarlane, the founder of Sonos, has spent the last few months sharing concerns from friends who feel that Warren opposes innovation. That's why MacFarlane has started pushing gently back and trying to argue why Warren would actually be good for Silicon Valley, much like how Google file employees argue breaking the company up would be good for Big Tech.

"She's not anti-tech, as you know, she's anti-monopoly," MacFarlane said, remembering an era when this line of thinking was more popular. "It's funny because in 2000 Silicon Valley would go wild for her."

Above all else, Silicon Valley executives value a candidate for what they value in their C suites: intense expertise. Analysts have praised Warren for running one of 2020's most effective campaigns, and collectors say this has made her love to donors who are not disposed to like her but who admire the execution.

Warren last month began bypassing Joe Biden in some key early state polls, reflecting the slow embrace that Warren has found in Silicon Valley.

"People respect only success," said a Silicon Valley collector similar to another candidate. "It's a flight to quality."

Elizabeth Warren refuses to retaliate

Like all other donors, they flock in Silicon Valley to the people they have met. That's a problem for Elizabeth Warren, who refuses to work the circuit.

Take people like Mamoon Hamid, an influential venture capitalist at Kleiner Perkins who has met as many candidates as possible to make his choice. Friends and even CEOs of the portfolio company have flipped Hamid's arm to keep an open mind over candidates like Warren.

And he listens. But there is one problem – and that is true of other Silicon Valley donors who are considering Warren: He has not met her.

It is a common hold-up in the world of high dollar collecting, where a cocktail of ego and custom generally means that donors get what they want. And donors want to measure up to the person they hand over $ 2800 to – especially when they put their credibility on the line and ask their friends to do the same.

So Warren doesn't risk playing the game.

She was not always resistant to courting tech's big players. Prior to her winter decision to foreclose on closed-door collections, the Warren Bay Area visited glittery, high-dollar bass several times a year – stemming from a 2012 fundraising campaign at Oakland A's co-owner Guy Saperstein during her first run for an office for an October 2018 lunch hosted by Karla Jurvetson, which helped her raise over $ 100,000 just two months before announcing the presidential run. But the incident in Jurvetson's living room would be Warren's last event of this kind.

Warren was very popular when she was feted by a network of wealthy women called Electing Women Bay Area PAC in the fall of 2017, so much so that the group had to place a rare cap on the number of people who could attend because there was too much interest for her two events, which raised over $ 100,000 for her.

But in 2020? Despite hosting almost all of the best women running for president, Warren has repeatedly rejected the choice of women's excuses because of the high-dollar collection rule. Wear employees even have kiboshed attempts to make a private event for donors who aren't technically collecting money or a smaller button-up event, with the woman's young children, according to people familiar with the matter.

And this time around, Warren has proven to be an elusive character for the very people who want to throw money at her. Some of her biggest supporters in the Bay Area say that even they haven't received phone calls from her.

Silicon Valley donors have at times become desperate to get the access and attention needed for the high dollar campaign. With typical technical diligence, they try every angle they can to get to her.

Some donors have tried to convince Warren's staff to relax her rule prohibiting fundraising – to no avail.

"They don't even want the look of a donor asking," said a source. "We've tried every lever."

Several of Silicon Valley supporters of Warren expressed frustration that the campaign did not allow any high-dollar donors to organize on her behalf. Warren's campaign doesn't even keep track of how much the supporters voluntarily collect, or "package" for her – totals that typically motivate healthy competition between well-connected donors and are often considered when a new president awards ambassadors. Her aids have told people that there are no secret plans for an outside group like a super PAC. Warren will not even take one-on-one, no-strings-attached, get to know you meet with rich donors.

You can give the legal maximum to the campaign, and that's it. A wink-wink arrangement this is not.

"We want her to be president, and now it's hard to figure out that there's not much you can do – or that the things you don't usually do are open to you," said a technologically appealing Democratic gathering supporting Warren. "I can't talk to her now if I wanted to."

So when Warren finally came to the Bay Area as the headline for a rare fundraising campaign last August – one for the Democratic Party, not her campaign specifically – any high -Dollar Silicon Valley donors saw it as an opportunity to get the access they crave (and almost always get) .A photograph with the presidential candidate is a timed memorial from the high-dollar hoardings.

This was their chance to finally come in front of Warren, some donors believed, and saw fork over as much as $ 50,000 to attend, a VIP reception and grab and grind with possibly the next Democratic nominee for president. Valley, who had no plans to attend another Democratic Party fundraiser, suddenly bought a table.

Another Democratic fundraiser supporting Warren sent out an email to the list of a few hundred like-minded donors, many of whom are tech savvy: "This is the way to meet her if you want to meet her in the Bay Area." [19659062] Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren speaks behind a podium with arms raised to the sides. ” data-upload-width=”4000″ src=”https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/6vbxvZrmZ89v41iOqooSbFvTwh0=/0x0:4000×2579/1200×0/filters:focal(0x0:4000×2579):no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/19120898/1163406919.jpg.jpg”/>

JOSH EDELSON / AFP / Getty Images