GOP legislators shared at House antitrust tech probe

  Sen. Mike Lee "title =" Sen. Mike Lee "/> </source></source></source></source></picture></div><figcaption>
                " Antitrust is a very technical request, not something that lends itself to simple generalizations or carpet condemnations, "said Utah Sen. Mike Lee in a statement technology </p><div class=

The Judicial Committee launched a Sunday Monday to see if Silicon Valley's technology titans are engaged in competition competition

Republicans are divided over a new democratically led technology industry anti-trust survey, highlighting the tensions between GOP's growing criticism of companies such as Google and Facebook and the party's traditional aversion to regulate the business.

The Judiciary Committee launched the probe Monday to see if Silicon Valley's technological titans have engaged in competition – and some Republican lawmakers were quick to hear their democratic counterparts.

The story goes on under

"I'm All For It," said the Senate's court order rmann, Lindsey Graham (RS.C.) on the house trial, while other Senate judges John Neely Kennedy (R-La.) told reporters that it is time for Congress to investigate how the power industry's growing power affects consumers.

"Look, I'm very proud of the big social media companies," Kennedy told reporters. "They are all American companies, they have been incredibly successful. That's why they're so big. But they're no longer companies – they're land."

Other Congress Republicans claimed their enthusiasm. others reacted with caution to the idea that Congress was taking on an antitrust role that is normally in the hands of the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission – both of which have recently been interested in technological giants such as Google and Amazon.

"Antitrust is a very technical request, not something that lends itself to simple generalizations or emptying," says a statement by Utah Sen. Mike Lee, representing the Senate Court's antitrust panel that would be in a good position to monitor a probe "Therefore, such investigations are best left to the antitrust agencies instead of the congress."

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), A leading technology industry critic, agreed that federal regulators would be "more effective" than Congress In the police on the problem, he suggested that lawmakers instead focus on issues such as protecting the consumer's data integrity.

Reactions emphasize repetition dueling impulses regarding technology in the Trump era, many of which have been tracking internet giants such as Google, Facebook and Twitter, especially over what they see as an anti-conservative bias in the way companies manage content, some have banned the prospect of removing the industry long-term protection. But most Republicans also argued for the party's instinctive distast to everything that deletes regulation – even less trusting.

GOPs several hawkish tech critics include Graham, who has complained about the unregulated "wild wild west" of social media companies and said he is "certainly willing to look at his business model" as well. Another is Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, who has accused digital platforms of suppressing conservative speech.

"I was glad to see the house launch this survey, and I would like to see the Senate's judiciary do the same," Cruz said.

House Democrats have not yet released the full scope of the probe. Men Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), Head of the House Judiciary antitrust subcommittee who spies the congressional investigation, specifically called Google, Facebook and Amazon as a "significant part" of it during his announcement Monday. He said he is willing to speak and force witnesses to testify to it.

Supreme Republican judge, Doug Collins of Georgia and Jim Sensen burner from Wisconsin, the top republican on the antitrust panel, initially praised the Democrats' probe, with Collins who made the effort a "bipartisan" opportunity to investigate whether the technology industry continues to be competitive and "if necessary to act".

But a GOP committee later tried to draw some boundaries around that support, suggesting that the two Republican legislators are leery of some of the more aggressive tactics Cicilline mentioned.

Collins and Sensenbrenner have agreed to "less formal oversight activity to look at major technology," said the aide, who spoke anonymously because they were not authorized to speak at the post. Aiden added that "there have been no two bipartisan agreements to investigate, condemn, compel, or initiate a critical investigation" in particular companies.

The reluctance contradictions of some of the fiery rhetoric republics have been marked as they aim at perceived bias from Google, Facebook and Twitter, which deny any political favorite in the way they handle their platforms.

Several GOP lawmakers, including Cruz and Hawley, even drew the idea of ​​revising a 1996 law that gives websites immunity from lawsuits over content users have posted. It is a critical provision for the internet industry, which shields companies from expensive litigation if something that is terrible appears in a search result, YouTube video or Facebook post, for example.

Technical antitrust problem is not likely to disappear for Republicans at any time soon, with the theme taking center stage in the democratic presidential election. Later Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) Has asked for a breakup of Facebook, Google, Amazon and Apple, and then Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) Supports calls to share Facebook.

Meanwhile, the Justice Department has opened the door to its own antitrust investigation by Google, although it has not yet said whether to launch such a probe. People familiar with DOJ's activities confirmed in POLITICO and other news organizations last week that the department has taken jurisdiction over a potential Google probe as part of a recent deal with the Federal Trade Commission.

The Ministry of Justice has also claimed jurisdiction over any antitrust claims involving Apple, while the FTC will deal with any investigations by Facebook and Amazon, according to news reports and sources familiar with the case. The two agencies meet periodically to divide companies into industry groups and determine which agency will handle an investigation, if there are violations that will warrant investigation, an FTC official has told POLITICO.

Whether any of these process features will flourish into full blown investigations, or result in fines or other penalties, remains unclear. But all four companies have encountered complaints in both the US and Europe from rivals accusing them of abusing their dominant roles.

Source link

Back to top button

mahjong slot