https://nighthawkrottweilers.com/

https://www.chance-encounter.org/

Business

Facebook sells data? Emails show that it gave some companies preferential access to user data




Facebook gave some companies preferential access to user data – including invitations to friends in users networks – without permission, according to excerpts from e-mail issued by U.K. Parliament Wednesday. The social media giant and its founder Mark Zuckerberg also deleted ways to charge external companies for user data, showing the e-extract show.

Apps from businesses, including Airbnb, Netflix and Lyft, became "whitelisted" ̵[ads1]1; giving full access to users' friends – even after Facebook said in 2015, it had phased out that feature. "It is not clear that there was any user's consent to this, no matter how Facebook decided which companies should be whitelisted or not," wrote Damian Collins, a conservative MP chairing Parliament's major Facebook survey, in a preamble to Wednesday's release by Facebook email.

The email also shows CEO Mark Zuckerberg discusses ways to encourage users to share more on Facebook in a way that will "increase value" of the network.

"We are trying to enable people to share everything they want and to do it on Facebook," he sent on November 19, 2012, according to the documents. "Sometimes, the best way to enable people to share something, to have a developer build a special app or network for that type of content, and to do it socially by having a Facebook plugin in it. However, It may be good for the world but it's not good for us unless people share back to Facebook and that content increases the value of our network. "

According to Collins, Facebook also tried to minimize the fact that its Android app could collect users "Call and text stories " that know that the feature will be controversial.

The release comes as part of a lawsuit by Six4Three, a small developer, against Facebook. Six4Three sued Facebook after the 2015 changes effectively eliminated the access as the Six4Three app, called Pinkini, needed to operate.

In a statement on Wednesday, Facebook called the case "baseless" and said e-mail documents "are just part of the story and presented in a way that is highly misleading without any additional context."

"We are facing the platform changes we made in 2015 to prevent a person from sharing their friends' data with developers. Like any business, we had many internal conversations about the different ways we could build a sustainable business model for our platform. But the facts are clear: We have never sold people's data, says The statement.

According to Collins, Facebook emails show that it aggressively went for competitor apps, "with the consequence denying them access to data leading to the mistake of that business." At the same time, the email appears to show Facebook accommodated large companies that could become paying customers.

The emails also indicate that Zuckerberg counted as charging for data access, at least as far back as in 2012. An email from Zuckerberg October 7, 2012, five months after That the company was published spelled out some opportunities for charging developers: [19659011] I've been thinking about Platform's business model a lot this weekend … if we do it then devs can generate revenue for us in different ways, making it more acceptable for us to charge them a bit more to use platform. The basic idea is that any other revenue you generate for us gives you a credit against what fees you own us to use duty. For most developers, this will probably cover the cost altogether. So instead of paying us directly, they would only use our payment or advertising products. A basic model can be:

Login with Facebook is always free
Printing content to Facebook is always free.
Reading everything, including friends, costs a lot of money. Perhaps in the order of $ 0.10 / spend every year.

For the money you owe, you can cover it in one of the following ways:

Buying ads from us in neko or another system
Run our ads in your app or website (canvas apps do this already ) Use our payments
Sell your goods in our Karma store.

Or if the earnings we receive from these do not add more than the fees you owe us, you only pay the fee directly.

Facebook claims that it never sells user data, but many data privacy managers say that the difference between selling data and charging companies to access users based on their data is a pretty nice line for practical purposes.

– CNET's Dan Patterson and CBS News & # 39; Graham Kates contributed to reporting. This is a developing story.

© 2018 CBS Interactive Inc .. All rights reserved.



Source link

Back to top button

mahjong slot

https://covecasualrestaurant.com/

sbobet

https://mascotasipasa.com/

https://americanturfgrass.com/

https://www.revivalpedia.com/

https://clubarribamidland.com/

https://fishkinggrill.com/