Four million. It is the number of pieces of content on Facebook that the platform claims it took action to contain hate speech from January to March this year, according to its latest openness report. (And to give a good point on that, it's just the content it actually caught.) In a press release this afternoon, Vice President of Global Operations discussed Justin Osofsky's plan to steer a subset of moderators who are particularly concerned with managing hat spread  Illustration for article titled Facebook Pilots Anti-Hate Speech Moderation Team Because you know all Nazis and things “/>
"We are launching a pilot program where some reviewers specialize in hate speech," Osofsky said. "At present, most of our reviewers see content across the spectrum. By focusing on hate speech enforcement, these reviewers will establish a deeper understanding of how it manifests and be able to make more accurate conversations."
Facebook clarified that instead of hiring new personnel for this effort, existing moderators would be moved over. "The pilot has already launched […] with just a few dozen reviewers. We need to start slowly so as not to affect other work areas and ensure that we do this properly both in terms of process and support," said Gizmodo spokesman. we review how we provide the necessary support to these reviewers, and whether it limits time, further measures of support or other means. "Facebook has recently announced increases to pay and benefits for its moderators following years of critical criticism of the work reviews of content audits.
Facebook's report indicates that the amount of hate jumps is being acted upon, has grown steadily, whether it's a result of Facebook better enforcing its own rules or an inflation in this kind of content being posted is not clear from the numbers that are In any case, these numbers are almost certain that they will spike in the company's next transparency report: In March, the company finally decided that there was white nationalism and white separatism in its definition of hate speech.
While Facebook and hell, each other tech firm-touts AI as a catchall solution to the massive scale moderation problem, the transparency report reveals that nuances of the hat language make it more difficult to act proactively. While Facebook claims it has been capturing over 99 percent of spam, terrorist propaganda and child exploitation on the platform before users flagged it, the new transparency reports say less than two-thirds of hate speech posts also occur before being reported by users . Therefore, it is assumed the need for a specialized hate speech team.
Of course, the scale of Facebook makes it ripe for abuse, both by hate speech and disinformation variation – and it is not even to mention the company's own repeated lack of secure consumer data. Politicians such as Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, as well as early Facebook characters Robert McNamee and Chris Hughes, have all called for the company to be broken up by antitrust laws – the only suggestion that put Zuckerberg off on today's call.
Claiming that the most pressing issues of the day would not be solved by blocking Facebook's various products and business goals, the CEO half bragged it, "how much capital we can invest in all the security systems that go into what we are talking about today [is] bigger than the entire income of our company in the year before we went public, in 2012 only earlier this decade. Over the course of a decade, the success of this company has enabled us to fund this effort on a large scale. The amount of our budget that goes against our security systems is greater than Twitter's total revenue this year. "" I really believe the fight against malicious content is an incredibly important one, "added Zuckerberg. "We are fully invested in this and we will continue to do even more, and that's a bit of my view on this."