Elon Musk scrambles to keep Grimes, Azealia Banks out of investor lawsuit

Elis Musk's fateful "420" pot test on Twitter hits him in court again.

Tesla's billionaire chief is distorted to hold a couple of pop singers – his ex-boyfriend Grimes, as well as rapper Azealia Banks – out of the legal mess created by his August 7 tweet claiming he had secured funding to take it electric car manufacturer private for $ 420 per share.

Lawyers for Musk filed a motion this week that claimed against Grimes and Bank's complaints that have been suggested by angry Tesla shareholders; The lawyers claim that they are just an attempt at sensing these cases.

Miffed Tesla investors, who sue both Musk and the company, counteract that Grimes and Bank's banks are needed because of the proximity of the singers to Musk in the days and weeks surrounding the fire muscle.

The couple, who allegedly hung on Musk & # 39; s California mansion as the surrealistic August events unfolded, "can have information bearing on the truth of Musk's tweet," according to court records filed by the plaintiffs.

The Securities and Exchange Commission, which ended up finding Musk and Tesla $ 20 million every 7 August, and removing Musk as leader and forcing the addition of two independent board members, found in a probe that Musk's relationship with Grimes played a role by setting the price he said he would ask for Tesla.

"Musk stated that he rounded the price up to $ 420 because he had recently learned about the importance of the number in the marijuana culture," read the SEC suit. The suit added that Musk "thought his girlfriend would think it was fun." "

Banks, in a page-deleted Instagram post in the riot, claimed that Musk was on psychedelic drugs at the time of his tweet.

The suit also seeks to claim the New York Times, Business Insider and Gizmodo, which everyone spoke with Musk or Banks about the events around Musk's tweet

Musk's lawyer Dean Kirsty offset in a Thursday's motion that it is "readily apparent" that the proposed application is not a "legitimate attempt to preserve evidence." He pointed out that the plaintiffs are still did not contact Grimes or Banks "to find out if they themselves have relevant information."

Kristy continued to ask the judge to refuse the investor request and called it "rank speculation" to assume that Grimes wanted to know anything about Muskes Tesla

"None of the third parties who ever worked for Tesla or Musk, or allegedly had anything in his tweets or in the assessment of a potential go-private transaction," claims Kirsty.

"In fact, every defendant in all securities transactions has a spouse and friends, but it does not justify their discovery," he added.

Tesla shares ended the day up 5.8 percent to $ 31[ads1]7.69.

Source link

Back to top button