New Uncommanded Dive Risks
Last week, the FAA issued a statement on a new risk that Boeing must reduce. The new risk does not involve MACS, but can lead to similar results according to the Seattle Times.
The Federal Aviation Administration discovered that data processing of an aircraft computer on jetliner might cause the aircraft to dive in a way that pilots had difficulty recovering in simulator tests, according to two people familiar with the discovery who asked not to be named, discussed it.
Although the problem did not extend the maneuvering characteristics to the two accidents since October, 346 people killed, it can cause an uncommanded dive to resemble what happened in the collapse, according to a person who was not authorized to speak about. case.
David Learmount, Aviation Safety Advisor at Flight Global and a former Royal Air Force pilot, mentioned the details of the new issue being sketchy, but it may further delay MAX's return. "The implication is that this is different software in another control computer that presents similar symptoms," he said. "When you control a plane with computers, as we do now, you've always had potential for problems."
Boeing agreed on FAA findings, but has not yet submitted a solution to the FAA.
DoJ Probe Expands to the Dreamliner
The Seattle Times reports The DOJ probe expands beyond the Boeing 737 MAX, including the 787 Dreamliner.
Federal prosecutors have filed archives from Boeing related to the production of 787 Dreamliner in South Carolina, where there have been allegations of shoddy work, according to two sources familiar with the investigation.
The verdict of the judgment was issued by the Ministry of Justice (DOJ), the sources said. DOJ also carries out a criminal investigation of 737 MAX certification and design after two deaths in that jetliner. The 787 application raises the scope of DOJ's review of security issues at Boeing.
The groundbreaking investigation of the MAX has been hidden in secrecy, but some of the Justice Department's activities have become known as prosecutors filed for document filings. The claims of 787 Dreamliner have centered on scary work and cutting corners at the company's South Carolina facility.
Prosecutors probably see if there are major cultural issues throughout the company, according to the third source and one person in South Carolina, who also spoke on condition of anonymity due to the vulnerability of the case. It may include pressures to sign up for improper work to avoid delays in delivering aircraft to customers, said the source .
The entire [Dreamliner] fleet was grounded in January 2013 after two overheating events: a battery fire on an empty 787 parked at the port of Boston airport, saw a crumbling battery on a plane in Japan that forced an emergency landing. The FAA lifted the ground in April 2013 after Boeing has modified the jets with wavy batteries, containment boxes and ventilation pipes.
In the 737 MAX survey, the prosecutors seem to get information from someone with insight into the plane's development-based questions The questions they ask, the third source said.
$ 9 one hour programmer with no aviation experience
Shoddy work and cutting corners? Uh … Yeah.
Bloomberg reports [Boeing’s 737 Max Software Outsourced to $9-an-Hour Engineers] (Boeing 737 Max Software is released to $ 9 one-hour engineers)
It remains the mystery of the heart of Boeing Co.s 737 Max Crisis: How a Company Is Known for Thorough Design Made Apparently basic software failure leading to a couple of deadly crashes. Longtime Boeing engineers say the effort was complicated by a pressure to outsource work to lower paid entrepreneurs.
The Max software – plagued by problems that could keep the plans grounded months later after US regulators a week showed a new error – was developed at a time, Boeing was laid by experienced engineers and pushed vendors to cut costs.
Increasingly, the iconic US planner and its subcontractors rely on temporary workers who make as little as $ 9 an hour to develop and test software, often from countries lacking a deep background in aviation – especially India .
In offices facing Seattle's Boeing Field, newly graduated graduates employed by Indian software developer HCL Technologies Ltd. several rows of desks, said Mark Rabin, a former Boeing software engineer, who worked in a flight test group that supported Max.
The codes from HCL were usually designed to be specification see Boeing. Still, "it was controversial because it was far less effective than Boeing engineers who just wrote the code," Rabin said. Often he remembered: "I took many rounds back and forth because the code was not done properly ."
Not only did Boeing benefit from cheap coders who did not know Bloomberg notes that Boeing's cultivation of Indian companies seemed to pay other dividends.
Boeing won several orders for Indian military and commercial aircraft, such as $ 22 billion in January 2017 to deliver SpiceJet Ltd. This order included 100,737-Max 8 rays and represented Boeing's largest order from an Indian airline, a coup in a country dominated by Airbus.
Grounded for Cause
The Wall Street Journal reports the Boeing 737 MAX which is likely grounded to late this year.
Boeing Co.'s 737 MAX fleet is expected to be grounded late this year as a result of the latest aircraft control issue flagged by US aviation security regulators, according to people who have been informed of the problem.  The decline, at least, is expected to cause more disturbances in the airline plans across the US and abroad as some 500 of the aircraft remain empty for months longer than previously thought.
During simulator tests of certain emergency procedures, FAA pilots revealed a potentially dangerous situation they had not encountered before, according to people who were informed of the problem. The essence of the problem, according to Boeing's official and company airline announcements, is that if a chip inside the aircraft's flight control computer fails, it may cause unsteady movement of a panel on the aircraft's tail, pointing its nose down. 19659031] Testing the emergency procedures to cope with this so-called rolling stabilization condition, the official said, that it would take average pilots longer than expected to recognize and counteract the problem.
Darn de Simulators
When you use actual flight simulators instead of the iPad's problems emerge. But all the time Boeing has insisted and still insists on iPads, all pilots have to train.
No new parts required
"We think this can be updated using a software set," said a Boeing official.
Of course it does.
It may take many months if the 737 fleet needs new parts.
What could possibly go wrong?
Boeing took a base 1964 design, overloaded it with large engines that made the plane unstable, depending on poorly crafted software that could not easily be overridden to keep the aircraft from nosediving in crashes, while insistent training could take place on an iPad.
What could possibly go wrong with that set of cost-saving decisions?
Unfortunately, we just found out.
Yet, even after the second accident, Boing asked to flip the plane into use.
Mike "Mish" Shedlock