قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Business / As questions run around Jeff Bezo's explosive proposal, the identity of tabloid leaker is verified

As questions run around Jeff Bezo's explosive proposal, the identity of tabloid leaker is verified



The secret of who gave the national query information about the romance between Bezos and Lauren Sanchez has triggered much intrigue. Bezos launched an investigation of the case, and the leader of that investigation has said that it was a politically motivated leak. Bezos, in a blog post last week, suggested that either President Donald Trump or the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia might have played a role or that the National Enquirer might have acted to curry favor with them.
Since then, two other news organizations have reported that Michael Sanchez, Lauren Sanchez's brother, was the first tipster. The Daily Beast, quoting sources at National Enquirer's parent company, American Media Inc., reported Sunday that Michael Sanchez was the tabloid source. The Associated Press reported Tuesday that Bezos' investigation had concluded that Michael Sanchez leaked private text messages between the Amazon founder and Lauren Sanchez.

On Wednesday, Michael Sanchez declined to give CNN a record comment on whether he was leaking. He denied earlier that The Washington Post played a role in leaking details of the relationship between Bezos and his sister, and told The New York Post he would not appreciate such claims with an answer.

A representative of AMI told CNN on Wednesday that the company "refuses to comment on sources."

The suggestions as to whether Trump or Saudi Arabia might have a role in revealing the relationship have been untouched since Bezos first made them in a blog post last week describing his interaction with the national investigator.

Yesterday, Bezos wrote in a medium post that the National Inquirer and AMI had tried to extort him using explicit images he had sent Lauren Sanchez as tabloid said it got.

In his blog post, Bezos wrote lumbering details in front of the reader, mentioning both Trump and Saudi Arabia.

Bezos wrote that his ownership of The Washington Post, which has covered both Trump and the Saudi government critically, was a "complex" for him.

In fact, Bezos suggested ̵

1; although he did not say it directly – that Saudis or Trump, or perhaps both, might have had a role in revealing their relationship with the National Enquirer.

But six days later Bezos has not provided any evidence to support these ideas. And while giving emails to support his allegation of extortion, the absence of evidence of the other explosive proposals has only increased interest in the case.

  Report: National Enquirer publisher asked the Ministry of Justice if it was necessary to register as a foreign agent
But it seems that AMI would have ties to Saudi Arabia. Elkan Abramowitz, a lawyer for AMI CEO David Pecker, told ABC News that the company had been seeking funding from Saudis, but "never got any". The company inexplicably clarified a shiny magazine that promotes the kingdom in 2018, when the original crown prince Mohammed bin Salman visited the United States and met business leaders. And Pecker took a guest tied to the Saudi government for a White House dinner in July 2017, according to The New York Times.
Adel al-Jubeir, Saudi Arabia's former foreign minister, told CBS News that the government had "nothing to do with" Bezo's allegations, and Abramowitz told ABC News, the source of the story was "not Saudi Arabia."

"American Media has not, or have we ever had, any editorial or financial ties to Saudi Arabia Arabia," a company spokesman told CNN earlier this week in response to questions in the case.

Addressing the idea that the inquiry investigation was somehow pursued by the Saudis or by AMI's desire to connect with the Saudis, a current high level executive at AMI told CNN Wednesday, "We all laugh that it has become a thing because it's a year old. Saudi never gave any money to the Enquirer. "

There are also known links between Trump and AMI. Pecker and Trump are friends for a long time, and in the 2016 election, Enquirer often targeted Trump's political opponents while gaining glowing coverage. The Inquirer also engaged in a "catch and kill" tactic, paying for the rights to embarrassing stories of Trump, and never publishing them. Pecker was granted immunity last summer to provide federal investigators with information on such hush money.
The person who led Bezo's investigation of the case, Gavin de Becker, told The Daily Beast on Sunday that the first phase of his investigation has been completed. That part of the survey, as he said, focused on who leaked the text messages between Bezos and Lauren Sanchez to the National Enquirer and why.

While de Becker said he was turning this information over to Bezos lawyers, he refused to disclose to the public any details of what his investigation found. The Daily Beast reported that it had undergone documents related to the investigation, but it was not clear whether the documents were from de Becker's investigation.

De Becker had previously been quoted in The Daily Beast and said "strong leaders" in his investigation into leakage of text messages to the National Enquirer "points to political motives." He told The Washington Post that there was a "politically motivated" leak directed to the embarrassing Bezos. In both cases, Becker does not seem to give any evidence to support his statements.

De Becker did not give CNN a post-comment, despite several requests. An Amazon representative also refused to comment and noted that the questions did not concern the company. Bezos has no other famous spokesmen representing him.

CNN asked de Becker and the Amazon spokesman was: Why did Bezos mention Saudis and Trump in his blog post? What were the findings of the Becker survey? Will Bezos share with the public information about the Becker survey?

In Bezos' first Thursday blog post, he shared an email from Dylan Howard, the chief institute's chieftain. Howard, in that email, outlined the various pictures he said the table "achieved during our news collection." These images included what Howard described as "under the belt selfie" – otherwise commonly known as a "d * ck pick" and other explicit images of both Lauren Sanchez and Bezos.

Michael Sanchez insisted on CNN on Tuesday – before CNN reported that he was the first source of the national commissioner – that he was told that the investigation "cleared" him with "some involvement" related to images involving Bezos' genitals. He said he was given the information by a third party with knowledge of the investigation and that he had not been told directly that he had been cleared of investigators.

"I have been told that the Amazon survey decided that I was not involved in leakage of d * ck pics because I never had access to any of the d * ck images," he told CNN.

Michael Sanchez also doubted the rigor of the Becker survey on Tuesday and told CNN that throughout the survey, de Becker never asked to investigate my phone, laptop or notes or identified me as an investigator. He suggested Bezos's suggestion that Saudis or Trump possibly play a role in leakage of the National Enquirer's text messages was an attempt to distract.

If Bezos does not ultimately provide the public with more details or evidence supporting the suspicions that he and de Becker seem to have, it is possible that federal authorities might. According to two people who are familiar with the case, the plaintiffs are accusing the US law firm of the Southern District of New York, how the national inquirer behaves and how the tabloid handles the reporting to Bezos.

Source link